MATLAB
MATLAB and its add-ons are not full CAD/CAM packages, but they do cover a lot of the modeling, simulation, control-design, visualization and code-generation pieces that surround a CAD/CAM workflow. You can import CAD geometry, simulate multibody dynamics, design controllers, generate embedded code (G-code post-processing is possible by scripting), and connect to hardware — but you wouldn’t use MATLAB instead of SolidWorks/FreeCAD (for precise geometry design) or Mastercam/Fusion CAM (for toolpath generation) as your primary CAD/CAM tool. Think of MATLAB as the brains (math, control, simulation, offline path planning and automation), and dedicated CAD/CAM tools as the geometry & toolpath specialists.
Below I put together a practical, step-by-step “control systems learning project” you can run right now in MATLAB (and Simulink if you have it). It’s hands-on: derive the math, implement the model, simulate, design controllers (PID and LQR), test robustness, and optionally move to Simulink / hardware. I give runnable MATLAB scripts / snippets so you can copy/paste and learn rather than only “put figures and numbers in”.
What you’ll get from the project
Build physical models from first principles (equations of motion).
Implement transfer-function and state-space models in MATLAB.
Do time- and frequency-domain analysis (step, Bode, margins).
Design controllers: PID (pidtune) and state-feedback / LQR.
Validate with disturbance / parameter variation tests.
Move the design to Simulink and (optionally) Simscape for physics-level simulation.
Notes about toolboxes required and next steps (hardware/code generation).
Toolboxes / add-ons you might need
Control System Toolbox (transfer function, bode, pidtune, lqr, place) — highly recommended.
Simulink (block-diagram simulation).
Simscape / Simscape Multibody / Simscape Electrical (detailed physical models and CAD import).
Simulink Coder / Embedded Coder (generate C code for microcontrollers/targets).
System Identification Toolbox (fit models from measured data). (If you don’t have a toolbox, you can still do many steps by coding the math yourself in MATLAB.)
Electrical dynamics
Mechanical dynamics
Transfer function (voltage to angular velocity)
First-order approximation (neglect L)
PENDULUM EQUATIONS
Nonlinear equation of motion
Linearized (small-angle approximation)
Transfer function (torque to angle)
Natural frequency
Project A — DC motor: from physics → controller → Simulink
Goal: model an armature-controlled DC motor, analyze, design PID and LQR controllers, check robustness.
1) Derive the model (read this once and put into code)
Electrical:
Mechanical:
Laplace domain and eliminate 𝐼(𝑠) ⇒ transfer function from applied voltage 𝑉(𝑠) to angular velocity Ω(𝑠):
If electrical inductance L is negligible you get a first-order approximation.
2) Example numeric parameters (toy motor)
We'll use (typical demo values):
J = 0.01 kg·m²
b = 0.1 N·m·s/rad
Kt = 0.01 N·m/A
Ke =m0.01 V·s/rad
R = 1 Ω
L = 0.5 H
Arithmetic:
DC Motor Arithmetic
1) Product of L and J
Represents the product of electrical inductance L and rotor inertia J.
This term multiplies s^2, contributing to the second-order dynamics of the motor.
2) Lb + RJ term
Represents the cross-coupling of electrical and mechanical damping.
LbLbLb = inductance × viscous friction.
RJRJRJ = resistance × inertia.
This multiplies sss, i.e., the damping term in the dynamics.
3) Rb + K_t K_e term
Contains both electrical resistance × viscous friction (RbRbRb) and the motor constants (KtKeK_tK_eKtKe).
This is the constant term in the denominator (affects steady-state gain and system stability).
👉 In summary:
LJ → inertia + inductance (second-order dynamics).
Lb+RJ → damping effects (first-order).
Rb+KtKe → combined losses + motor constants (steady-state term).
3) Run this MATLAB script (dc_motor_demo.m)
% DC motor demo - copy into dc_motor_demo.m
clear; close all; clc;
% Parameters
J = 0.01; % kg*m^2
b = 0.1; % N*m*s/rad
Kt = 0.01; % N*m/A
Ke = 0.01; % V*s/rad
R = 1; % Ohm
L = 0.5; % H
% Transfer function G(s) = Omega(s)/V(s)
num = Kt;
den = [L*J, (L*b + R*J), (R*b + Kt*Ke)]; % [a2 a1 a0]
G = tf(num, den);
% First-order approx (neglect L*J term)
den1 = [R*J, (R*b + Kt*Ke)]; % a1 s + a0
G_approx = tf(num, den1);
% Plots
figure; bode(G); grid on; title('Bode - full DC motor model');
figure; step(G); grid on; title('Step response - full model');
figure; step(G_approx); grid on; title('Step response - first-order approx');
% Design a PID with pidtune (if available)
if exist('pidtune','file')
C_pid = pidtune(G,'PID'); % automatic tuning
T_cl = feedback(C_pid*G, 1);
figure; step(T_cl); grid on; title('Closed-loop with pidtune PID');
else
warning('pidtune not found - design PID manually');
end
% State-space (states: i, omega)
A = [-R/L, -Ke/L;
Kt/J, -b/J];
B = [1/L; 0];
C = [0 1]; % output: omega
D = 0;
sys_ss = ss(A,B,C,D);
% LQR design (regulator)
Q = diag([1, 100]); % penalize omega more (adjust to taste)
R_lqr = 0.01;
K = lqr(A,B,Q,R_lqr);
% Closed-loop Acl = A - B*K
Acl = A - B*K;
sys_cl_lqr = ss(Acl, B, C, D);
figure; step(sys_cl_lqr); grid on; title('Step response - LQR state-feedback (no reference gain)');
% Note: to track a reference r you need a reference gain Nbar (not shown).4) Experiments & exercises (do these)
Compare full 2nd-order model vs 1st-order approximation — when is the approximation valid?
Use
rlocus(G)andnyquist(G)to design controllers by root locus and frequency methods.Add a disturbance torque (e.g., step torque) and test disturbance rejection.
Vary parameters (±20% J, b) and measure closed-loop performance (overshoot, settling time).
If you have System Identification Toolbox: generate simulated noisy step data and run
tfestto estimate G.
5) Simulink & Simscape
Minimal Simulink: blocks: Step → PID Controller → Plant (Transfer Fcn using num/den) → Sum (feedback) → Scope.
For physics-level: use Simscape Electrical + Simscape Driveline / Multibody to model coil, rotor, load; you can also import SolidWorks/STEP geometry into Simscape Multibody if you want realistic visuals.
Last updated
Was this helpful?