HDDs, SSDs, and Common Pitfalls

❌ Programs/operations to avoid (high risk)

These cause heavy I/O and will make the drive fail faster:

  • badblocks (read-write mode -w especially — destroys data)

  • fsck (repairs involve lots of reads/writes)

  • Full-disk antivirus/malware scans

  • Indexers/crawlers (like updatedb, tracker, baloo)

  • Torrenting or anything that thrashes the disk with random writes

  • Compiling large software from source

  • Video editing or VM images (massive sequential reads/writes)

  • Disk benchmarks (hdparm -tT, fio, etc.)

  • Continuous logging to the failing disk

⚠️ Programs that are okay in moderation

These involve reads but not as punishing as scans:

  • Normal shell commands (ls, cat, less)

  • Reading small configs / running lightweight tools (e.g. nano, vim)

  • smartctl (safe — just queries drive firmware)

  • GUI tools like gsmartcontrol (also safe — just queries)

  • rsync / cp — if used carefully to back up files (start with most important)

👉 The key is don’t run them across the entire filesystem unnecessarily. Only target what you need.

✅ Programs that are best suited right now

Use tools designed for data recovery with minimal stress:

  • ddrescue → copies the disk efficiently, skips bad areas, retries later.

  • rsync with --ignore-errors → copy important directories first. Example:

    rsync -av --ignore-errors /home /mnt/backup/

  • cp --reflink=auto --sparse=always (for selective file copies).

For visual/monitoring only:

  • smartctl -a /dev/sda (SMART data check).

  • dmesg | grep -i error (watch kernel errors).

💡 Best practice workflow

  1. Stop using the drive as your “working” drive. Don’t browse, code, or update Kali on it.

  2. Mount an external drive (SSD/HDD) and copy most critical files first.

  3. Use ddrescue if you want a whole-disk image.

  4. When backup is complete → retire the drive.

👉 In short:

  • SAFE: smartctl, rsync, ddrescue, light commands.

  • RISKY: fsck, badblocks, big scans, normal daily use.

Do you want me to suggest a minimal “safe rescue toolbox” install list (just the few programs you should put on Kali now, nothing extra)? That way you won’t be tempted to run dangerous tools.

You said:

Compiling large software from source---- think i did this once on an ssd and it killed the SSD and upto today i never understand why this happenned ...the program was fritzing

ChatGPT said:

Ah, that makes sense — and what you noticed is a real thing with SSDs (and sometimes with HDDs, though for different reasons). Let me unpack this for you so it clicks:

⚡ Why compiling can kill (or weaken) an SSD

  1. Compiling = insane read/write activity

    • A big compile (like a browser or kernel) creates thousands to millions of tiny files, writes object files, updates them repeatedly, then links everything.

    • On SSDs, every write consumes program/erase (P/E) cycles from NAND flash cells.

    • Unlike HDDs, which wear mechanically, SSDs wear electronically.

  2. Temporary files + scratch space

    • Compilers (e.g. gcc, clang) write temp files into /tmp and build directories.

    • If /tmp is on the SSD (default), it’s constantly being written to.

    • If the software was "fritzing" (crashing and restarting), it may have recompiled repeatedly, multiplying the write load.

  3. Write amplification

    • SSD controllers don’t write exactly what you ask — they write in blocks (often 128KB+).

    • Many small file writes = lots of garbage collection and internal rewriting → way more data written than you think.

  4. No TRIM / Overfilled SSD

    • If TRIM wasn’t enabled, or the SSD was nearly full, the controller had fewer spare blocks to work with.

    • That means even more rewriting and stress.

🔍 Why it “died” so fast

  • Low-end SSDs (especially older SATA ones) sometimes had weak controllers or cheap NAND with low endurance.

  • A buggy program in a tight compile–crash–compile loop could burn through TBs of writes in hours.

  • Once enough cells fail or the controller panics, the SSD goes read-only or just bricks.

🔧 How to avoid this in the future

  • Build on tmpfs (RAM): Put build dirs in memory instead of SSD:

    mkdir -p /mnt/ramdisk
sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=8G tmpfs /mnt/ramdisk

    Then compile inside /mnt/ramdisk → much faster, zero SSD wear.

  • Use an external HDD/SSD for scratch builds.

  • Enable TRIM (usually automatic with fstrim.timer on Linux):

    systemctl status fstrim.timer

  • Monitor SSD wear:

    sudo smartctl -a /dev/nvme0

    Look for % Used or Media_Wearout_Indicator.

⚠️ Key difference: HDD vs SSD

  • HDDs die mostly from mechanical wear (heads, motors, bad sectors). Compiling stresses them (lots of seeks), but they rarely die instantly unless they were already weak.

  • SSDs die from write exhaustion or controller panic. Heavy compiles can shorten life drastically if you don’t control temp writes.

👉 So your SSD probably didn’t die “mysteriously” — the fritzing compile loop wrote massive data in a short time, burned through its write budget, and killed it.

Would you like me to give you a safe “build environment” setup for Linux (RAM-based + HDD scratch space), so you never risk burning out an SSD again when compiling?

You said:

are you saying this is more likely to happen to an ssd more than hdd

ChatGPT said:

Exactly 👍 — it’s much more likely on an SSD than an HDD. Here’s why:

⚡ HDDs vs SSDs under heavy compile workloads

🔹 HDDs

  • Storage medium: magnetic platters.

  • Writes: no “wear limit” — you can overwrite the same spot millions of times, it’s not going to burn out cells.

  • Failure mode: mechanical — motors, heads, bearings, and platter surface damage.

  • Compile stress: heavy compiles thrash the disk head (lots of small random I/O), so it slows down massively, but it doesn’t usually kill the drive unless it was already close to failure.

🔹 SSDs

  • Storage medium: NAND flash.

  • Writes: each cell has a finite number of program/erase cycles (e.g. 1k–3k for consumer TLC). Once worn, the cell fails.

  • Failure mode: electronic wear or controller panic.

  • Compile stress: compiles create millions of tiny files and constant rewrites. This chews through write cycles, causes write amplification, and hammers the controller.

  • Outcome: a badly coded build loop can dump terabytes of writes in hours → enough to kill a cheap SSD early.

📊 Likelihood of “dying”

  • HDD → slow down, maybe develop bad sectors over months/years.

  • SSD → sudden failure (bricked, or turns read-only) if the write load overwhelms NAND endurance or the controller chokes.

⚖️ So:

  • HDDs = more resistant to “write abuse,” but die mechanically with age or shock.

  • SSDs = much faster for compiles, but writes are their kryptonite.

That’s why in pro setups, people often:

  • Compile in RAM (tmpfs) or on a scratch HDD.

  • Keep SSDs for OS + hot data, not constant recompilation loops.

👉 So yes — your SSD “mystery death” makes perfect sense. It’s far more likely from compiling than if you’d been using a regular spinning HDD.

Do you want me to show you how to set up your system so compiles never touch the SSD unnecessarily (RAM + HDD fallback), like a safe build workflow?

Checking and Understanding Disk Health in Kali Linux: HDDs, SSDs, and Common Pitfalls

Disk failures are among the most disruptive problems a Linux user can face. In this article, we’ll walk through a real-world troubleshooting session on Kali Linux that highlights how to check the health of your hard drive or SSD, what to look out for, and how to make informed choices about storage technology.

1. Why Disk Health Matters

Storage devices (whether HDDs or SSDs) are the foundation of your system. Unlike RAM or CPUs, when they fail, they take your data with them. Early detection of failure is therefore crucial.

Linux provides a number of tools for this, but the most powerful and widely used is smartctl, part of the smartmontools package. It reads the built-in Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology (SMART) data stored in the drive firmware.

2. Running SMART Checks on Linux

Install smartmontools

sudo apt update
sudo apt install smartmontools

Basic Health Check

sudo smartctl -H /dev/sda

  • PASSED → drive reports itself healthy.

  • FAILED → drive is in immediate danger of failure.

Detailed Report

sudo smartctl -a /dev/sda

This shows SMART attributes such as:

  • Reallocated_Sector_Ct → number of bad sectors remapped.

  • Current_Pending_Sector → unstable sectors waiting to be reallocated.

  • Offline_Uncorrectable → sectors the drive cannot recover.

  • Power_On_Hours → total operating hours.

If these numbers are high or if the self-assessment test reports FAILED, the disk is on borrowed time.

3. Example: Failing HDD

In our case study, a 500 GB HGST HDD reported:

SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!
Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA.

Key findings:

  • Reallocated_Sector_Ct = FAILING_NOW

  • 197 Current_Pending_Sector = 13744

  • 196 Reallocated_Event_Count = 813

Translation: the disk has thousands of unstable sectors and is unable to reallocate new ones. Data loss is imminent.

Action: Back up everything immediately. No repair tool will bring this drive back to safe operation.

4. Can SMART Be Run on Mounted Filesystems?

Yes. smartctl communicates directly with the drive firmware, not the filesystem.

  • Running smartctl -H or -a is completely safe on mounted disks.

  • Running self-tests (short or long) is also safe, but may reduce performance while in progress.

  • Running fsck or badblocks is not safe on mounted partitions — always unmount first.

5. Visualizing Bad Sectors

If you want to see where the damage lies, you can use tools like:

  • GSmartControl → GUI frontend for SMART with self-test logs.

  • badblocks → scans for unreadable sectors. Use carefully (read-only mode: -n not used).

  • e2fsck -c → checks for bad blocks in ext filesystems.

But remember: these do not “repair” the physical issue. At best, the filesystem can mark bad areas as unusable.

6. SMART over USB Enclosures

SMART often fails when using USB-to-SATA bridges. Example:

/dev/sdb: Unknown USB bridge [0x7825:0xa2a4]
Please specify device type with the -d option.

Fix:

sudo smartctl -d sat -a /dev/sdb

Other options: -d scsi, -d usbjmicron, -d usbprolific, or check with:

sudo smartctl --scan-open

If nothing works, the USB bridge does not pass SMART — connect the disk directly via SATA or use a better adapter.

7. HDDs vs SSDs: Strengths and Weaknesses

HDD (Hard Disk Drive)

  • Pros: Cheap per GB, data can sometimes be partially recovered even after mechanical failure, predictable wear.

  • Cons: Slow random access, fragile (moving parts), large power draw, noisy.

  • Failure mode: Gradual (bad sectors, clicks, slowdowns). Often gives warning.

SSD (Solid State Drive)

  • Pros: Extremely fast, shock-resistant, silent, low power.

  • Cons: Limited write endurance (though modern SSDs are far better), data loss can be sudden and total, harder recovery.

  • Failure mode: Can die without much warning if firmware crashes or NAND cells wear out.

8. Why Compiling Can Kill SSDs

When compiling large software (e.g., Chromium, kernels, Fritzing), the build system creates thousands of small temporary files. On HDDs, this just stresses the seek head. On early SSDs (or cheap ones without good wear leveling), it could burn through write cycles quickly.

Today, modern SSDs with wear-leveling and high endurance ratings (measured in TBW, terabytes written) rarely die from casual compiling. But cheap/old drives may still wear fast.

9. Best Practices to Extend Drive Life

For HDDs:

  • Avoid shocks and drops.

  • Don’t let them run hot.

  • Defragment only on Windows (Linux filesystems rarely need it).

  • Don’t ignore increasing reallocated sectors.

For SSDs:

  • Keep 15–20% free space to allow wear leveling.

  • Don’t run frequent low-level benchmarks that write to the entire disk.

  • Enable TRIM (fstrim.timer on Linux).

  • Avoid unnecessary swap on SSD (use enough RAM or a swapfile with low swappiness).

For Both:

  • Backups are the only true insurance.

  • Monitor SMART monthly with:

    sudo smartctl -H /dev/sdX

  • Keep important work on a reliable disk and backups on another.

10. Should You Stay on HDDs?

If you value predictability and recovery chances, HDDs can feel “safer.” They usually degrade gradually, and SMART often gives ample warning (like in our session).

But in practical terms:

  • A quality SSD (from Samsung, Crucial, Intel, WD, etc.) with decent endurance will last years under normal desktop loads.

  • The speed difference is so great that once you switch, HDDs feel painfully slow.

  • HDDs are still excellent for bulk storage (media, backups, archives).

  • SSDs are superior for OS, applications, and active work.

👉 Recommendation: Use a hybrid setup:

  • SSD for system + apps (fast, efficient).

  • HDD for bulk data storage + backups (cheap, reliable long-term).

Conclusion

In Kali Linux (or any Linux), SMART is your first line of defense against unexpected disk failure. In our case, SMART correctly predicted a catastrophic HDD failure, giving time to back up data. While HDDs may feel “safer” because of their gradual degradation, SSDs — if chosen wisely — provide years of reliable performance, provided you avoid pitfalls like running them full or using bargain-bin models.

The golden rule: 🔑 No drive is truly safe. Backups are the only guarantee.

PreviousManaging UEFI Boot EntriesNextSSDs

Last updated

Was this helpful?